The 1.2 Billion Taxpayer Giveaway

๐“๐ก๐ž $๐Ÿ.๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐“๐š๐ฑ๐ฉ๐š๐ฒ๐ž๐ซ ๐†๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐š๐ฐ๐š๐ฒ ๐๐š๐œ๐ค๐ž๐ ๐›๐ฒ ๐‚๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ ๐–๐จ๐จ๐ญ๐ž๐ง ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐›๐ข๐š ๐’๐ฐ๐š๐ฆ๐ฉ

The 2023 Scout Motors deal for an Electric Vehicle Plant in Blythewood by our state lawmakers is one of the largest taxpayer-funded projects in South Carolina history.

This package, which was put together without the knowledge of many legislators and put on special order to pass in mere days, deserves scrutiny.

๐‘๐ž๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐‚๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ ๐–๐จ๐จ๐ญ๐ž๐ง ๐ฏ๐จ๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐Ÿ๐š๐ฏ๐จ๐ซ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐ž๐š๐ฅ.

Hereโ€™s what that vote included:

Over $๐Ÿ.๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐จ๐ง in taxpayer-funded handouts:
โ€ข $1.09 billion in non-repayable infrastructure incentives
โ€ข $200 million in soil stabilization
โ€ข Funding pulled from state reserves and surplus funds

These dollars were directed toward ONE project covering:
โ€ข Road access and expansions
โ€ข Water and wastewater systems
โ€ข Rail infrastructure and bridge work
โ€ข Site preparation, mitigation, and soil stabilization
โ€ข Workforce training facilities

Since then, concerns have continued to grow:

โ€ข ๐‚๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ง๐ฌ ๐š๐ฅ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐๐ฒ ๐ž๐ฑ๐œ๐ž๐ž๐๐ข๐ง๐  $๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“๐ŸŽ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐จ๐ง, with additional funding being requested

โ€ข ๐€ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐„๐• ๐ฆ๐š๐ซ๐ค๐ž๐ญ, raising questions about long-term viability

โ€ข ๐ˆ๐ง๐Ÿ๐ซ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ-๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ค๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ, while other needs across South Carolina remain unaddressed

โ€ข ๐–๐ž๐ญ๐ฅ๐š๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ฐ๐จ๐จ๐ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ž๐ to make way for development for an "environmentally-friendly" industry

โ€ข ๐‹๐จ๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฏ๐จ๐ข๐œ๐ž๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐  ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, yet the project moved forward

This isnโ€™t a question of whether South Carolina should grow. We should. But conservative leadership means asking:

Is this the best use of taxpayer dollars?
Are we prioritizing one project at the expense of others?
Are we listening to the people who actually live there?

When over a billion dollars is committed, those questions arenโ€™t optional - theyโ€™re essential.

District 69 deserves leadership that will carefully evaluate deals of this scale BEFORE committing public resources, and ensure that growth in South Carolina is responsible, transparent, and accountable.

Thatโ€™s the standard Iโ€™m running on.


Previous
Previous

Endorsement Alert

Next
Next

Will you help us?